{"id":908,"date":"2018-08-21T10:17:40","date_gmt":"2018-08-21T10:17:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.casinousa.com\/?p=908"},"modified":"2018-08-21T10:17:40","modified_gmt":"2018-08-21T10:17:40","slug":"gli-settles-with-nevada-gaming-regulators-to-stop-disciplinary-action","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.casinousa.com\/news\/gli-settles-with-nevada-gaming-regulators-to-stop-disciplinary-action","title":{"rendered":"GLI Settles With Nevada Gaming Regulators To Stop Disciplinary Action"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"GamingGaming Laboratories International<\/a> (GLI) recently gained the unwanted distinction of being the only independent gaming software testers to face disciplinary action from gaming authorities in the state of Nevada<\/a>. <\/p>\n

The company is trusted to test and certify gambling software and technology that is used in casinos all over the world.<\/p>\n

The New Jersey based company agreed to a settlement which will see them pay $125,000<\/strong> to stop any further disciplinary action. <\/p>\n

The Nevada Gaming Commission leveled a three-count complaint against the company in relation to testing and certifying one of Interblock\u2019s gaming products. <\/p>\n

Dan Reaser<\/strong> is GLI\u2019s outside legal counsel and he explained to the commission that GLI has evaluated over 8,500 products in Nevada in the previous six years and that the mistake they made with Interblock represents a minuscule .00012 margin of error. He went on to say that even though GLI agreed to settle, if the matter had gone any further then GLI would have defended themselves. He even went so far as to say that he believed that they would have successfully had a number of those charges dropped.<\/p>\n

Nevada Relies On GLI<\/h2>\n

Philip Pro<\/strong> is a former federal judge and current member of the Gaming Commission. Pro acknowledged that the Nevada relies on GLI\u2019s reviews which was one of the main reasons why the commission agreed to settle as opposed to seeking stiffer disciplinary action that would possibly sully the company\u2019s reputation. While the commission let GLI move on with a $125,000 fine, Pro confirmed that a repeat violation would be looked upon in a very unfavourable light. <\/p>\n

The Allegations<\/h2>\n

The controversy started with GLI\u2019s testing of a system called Pulse Arena<\/a> which was developed by Interblock<\/strong>. The system includes betting stations that are integrated into a central system for gaming machines and other automated gaming products as well as a system that was developed by International Game Technology<\/strong>. <\/p>\n


\nInterblock Gaming<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n